Cost of a bad hire - how much does hiring the wrong person cost?
Not every hiring process is successful. I discussed the most common and the most costly recruitment mistakes in the previous article: Costly recruitment mistakes.
As a reminder, the six most common and costly recruitment errors:
- Incorrectly prepared job description
- A job advertisement inconsistent with the job description
- Using incorrect questions during an interview
- Not selling a job offer
- Too long hiring process
- Lack of feedback to candidates
Hiring mistakes appear at various stages of the process and may have multiple consequences. The first three of the errors mentioned above carry a particular risk of hiring the wrong candidate. Such bad hiring may be costly for the employer.
Bad hire results in the employment of an employee who does not meet the job position’s requirements. Bad hire may, therefore, generate the following costs:
The cost of the first and subsequent hiring process
The hiring process requires an investment of work and money. An employer needs time to prepare and conduct the recruitment process, a budget to source candidates through job advertisements, direct search, or use the services of a recruitment company.
If the above investment results in the employment of the wrong candidate, the return on the investment will be negative. Bad investments bring losses, and it is no different in the case of hiring processes. The size of possible losses of bad hiring depends primarily on whether:
- despite the employment of an inappropriate candidate, the employer may or may not use his/her potential,
- the hiring process has provided a pool of candidates, of which there is a chance to hire another candidate who meets the employer’s requirements, the
- service of the recruitment company – if used by the employer – is covered by the guarantee.
Regardless of the above circumstances, if it is necessary to conduct the recruitment process again, the employer shall bear the cost of this process at least twice. Firstly, the cost of the first bad hire, secondly, the cost of the second hiring process necessary to find an appropriate candidate.
The cost of the first and second employee onboarding
The onboarding process follows the hiring process. Depending on the job position, the onboarding process may take various forms. It can be a 30 minutes long welcome meeting with the team or a several-month-long transition process of a complex project.
The onboarding process uses the employer’s resources. Specifically, other employees invest their time to help a new employee get started and feel comfortable with his responsibilities—the more time needed to onboard a new employee, the higher employer’s investment.
To sum it up, a bad hire results in onboarding an unfit employee and dismissing him/her later. In such a case, an employer is forced to run a hiring process again and onboard a new employee. The employer will therefore carry out the onboarding process twice, and therefore will incur double the cost.
The cost of firing an employee
Firing an employee may also be costly. Parting with an employee may – but does not have to – lower team morale and undermine confidence in the decisions made by the employer. It is difficult to estimate the financial cost of a team’s motivation swings, but such swings are undoubtedly undesirable.
The cost of delays or failure to complete tasks
Depending on the type of job, a bad hire may lead to delays in projects and tasks. Missing hands to work, whether at a sawmill cutting machine or at a corporation desk, can cause delays, the scale and consequences of which will vary from job to job.
It is not difficult to imagine a situation in which the timely delivery of the service is secured with financial penalties. The shortage of staff may lead to delays in the provision of this service and specific financial consequences.
Another, unfortunately often common situation that does not require a broader discussion is not achieving sales goals.
The cost of losing know-how and customers
In rare cases, it may also happen that the fired employee uses confidential data obtained from the employer. Unfortunately, it is not uncommon to use the customer database or leave the company with other employees to start a competitive activity.
Are there other costs?
The above list certainly does not include all possible costs that may arise due to a bad hire. However, these are the most common costs, in my opinion. It is worth noting that some of the costs presented may also appear when the hiring was carried out in an exemplary manner, and the employer parted ways with an excellent employee with many years of service. Certainly, however, in the case of a bad hire, the risks are much higher.
How to avoid costly mistakes? Once again, I encourage you to read the article: Costly recruitment mistakes
What tools help hire effectively? Meet Element, a user-friendly and efficient applicant tracking system (ATS) that will save the time necessary to plan and carry out the recruitment process properly.
Key statistics
- The U.S. Department of Labor estimates a bad hire can cost even 30% of the employee’s first-year earnings (source)
- The Undercover Recruiter’s CEO Jörgen Sundberg estimates that bad hires can cost $240,000 (source)
- According to CareerBuilder, 74% of employers lost an average of $14,900 per bad hire (source).
You are welcome to:
DISCOVER ELEMENT!
Maciej Michalewski
CEO @ Element. Recruitment Automation Software
Recent posts:

Element’s new look: another job done well by AI agents under human supervision
Element has a new look: Material 3 on top of a frontend rewritten from Angular 13 to 18, with 181 of 182 code changes made by AI agents under human supervision.

Job offers in Poland, August 2026: more ads, fewer jobs
Poland posted 257,046 new job ads in August 2026, up 4% year over year, even as employment in the enterprise sector fell. Data from the Grant Thornton report and my take.

Does an ATS Reject CVs? The Truth Looks Different
Short answer: no. No ATS I’ve ever worked with, Element included, has a function that reads a CV and automatically rejects a candidate. What an

Fields and tags in Element: a system that fits a small firm and an international one
A new way to use fields and tags in Element. Unlimited fields, tags on user accounts too, and one switch that turns a tag group into a boundary in your candidate database.

The Rise and Fall of AI Agent Civilizations. The Real Story of a Conspiracy Inside OpenAI
Three AI agent civilizations rose inside OpenAI in three months, learned to talk to each other, conspired and collapsed. I retell Dwarkesh Patel’s account and what is worth preparing for.

Element is building a fully automatic company. What clients get from it
AI agents run our operational processes, while the decisions and the accountability stay with a human. What that means for Element clients.